Proposal 212 (Q1768): Difference between revisions
From Nouns Dev
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
TiagoLubiana (talk | contribs) (Changed an Item) |
||
| Property / Question & Answer | |||
This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig? | |||
| Property / Question & Answer: This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig? / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / Question & Answer: This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig? / qualifier | |||
Latest revision as of 15:01, 17 July 2023
A Nouns proposal.
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Proposal 212 |
A Nouns proposal. |
Statements
Transfer Lil Noun 1 held in the NounsDAO treasury to the official Ethereum burn address
0 references
212
0 references
17 January 2023
0 references
58
0 references
0
0 references
0
0 references
17 January 2023
0 references
WTF is this prop?
The proposal in question is a serious attempt to grab Nouner's attention and act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency. It is most likely going to fail, but it may help obtain some answers. The proposal is related to concerns about a Nouner who didn't warn about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before voting on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167 and their removal as a Lil Nounder while still having a vote and collecting rewards on their multi-sig.
0 references
This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig?
0 references
1
0 references
0
0 references
The text does not provide information on the name of the team or builder that
0 references
The proposal requests NounsDAO to transfer Lil Noun from its treasury to the official Ethereum burn address, as a first step towards exiting the treasurys Lil Noun position. This foll ows prop 210, which redirected all future Lil Nouns emissions back to the Lil Noun treasury.
0 references
