Proposal 212 (Q1768): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Created a new Item)
 
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / Label
 
Transfer Lil Noun 1 held in the NounsDAO treasury to the official Ethereum burn address
Property / Label: Transfer Lil Noun 1 held in the NounsDAO treasury to the official Ethereum burn address / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Id
 
212
Amount212
Unit1
Property / Id: 212 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Nouns DAO proposal URL
 
Property / Nouns DAO proposal URL: https://nouns.wtf/vote/212 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposer
 
Property / Proposer: 0x696ed7b26f4b019ceec78dc8b9140ad64a6f354b / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / ExecutionETA
 
17 January 2023
Timestamp+2023-01-17T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 day
Before0
After0
Property / ExecutionETA: 17 January 2023 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Quorumvotes
 
58
Amount58
Unit1
Property / Quorumvotes: 58 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Status
 
Property / Status: CANCELLED / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Opposer Count
 
0
Amount0
Unit1
Property / Opposer Count: 0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Supporter Count
 
0
Amount0
Unit1
Property / Supporter Count: 0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Transfer / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Lil noun #1 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Nounsdao treasury / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposal Type
 
Property / Proposal Type: Official ethereum / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Previous Proposal
 
Property / Previous Proposal: Proposal 76 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Previous Proposal
 
Property / Previous Proposal: Proposal 210 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Proposal Submission Date
 
17 January 2023
Timestamp+2023-01-17T00:00:00Z
Timezone+00:00
CalendarGregorian
Precision1 day
Before0
After0
Property / Proposal Submission Date: 17 January 2023 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Related Channel
 
Property / Related Channel: The Jungle: Nouns DAO - 212-transfer-lilnoun1-to-burn-addr / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer
 
WTF is this prop?
Property / Question & Answer: WTF is this prop? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: WTF is this prop? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: WTF is this prop? / qualifier
 
Answer: The proposal in question is a serious attempt to grab Nouner's attention and act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency. It is most likely going to fail, but it may help obtain some answers. The proposal is related to concerns about a Nouner who didn't warn about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before voting on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167 and their removal as a Lil Nounder while still having a vote and collecting rewards on their multi-sig.
Property / Question & Answer
 
This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig?
Property / Question & Answer: This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig? / qualifier
 
Property / Team Size
 
1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Team Size: 1 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstain Count
 
0
Amount0
Unit1
Property / Abstain Count: 0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Team Name
 
The text does not provide information on the name of the team or builder that
Property / Team Name: The text does not provide information on the name of the team or builder that / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Summary
 
The proposal requests NounsDAO to transfer Lil Noun from its treasury to the official Ethereum burn address, as a first step towards exiting the treasurys Lil Noun position. This foll ows prop 210, which redirected all future Lil Nouns emissions back to the Lil Noun treasury.
Property / Summary: The proposal requests NounsDAO to transfer Lil Noun from its treasury to the official Ethereum burn address, as a first step towards exiting the treasurys Lil Noun position. This foll ows prop 210, which redirected all future Lil Nouns emissions back to the Lil Noun treasury. / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:01, 17 July 2023

A Nouns proposal.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proposal 212
A Nouns proposal.

    Statements

    0 references
    Transfer Lil Noun 1 held in the NounsDAO treasury to the official Ethereum burn address
    0 references
    212
    0 references
    17 January 2023
    0 references
    58
    0 references
    0 references
    0
    0 references
    0
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    17 January 2023
    0 references
    WTF is this prop?
    The proposal in question is a serious attempt to grab Nouner's attention and act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency. It is most likely going to fail, but it may help obtain some answers. The proposal is related to concerns about a Nouner who didn't warn about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before voting on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167 and their removal as a Lil Nounder while still having a vote and collecting rewards on their multi-sig.
    0 references
    This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig?
    0 references
    1
    0 references
    0
    0 references
    The text does not provide information on the name of the team or builder that
    0 references
    The proposal requests NounsDAO to transfer Lil Noun from its treasury to the official Ethereum burn address, as a first step towards exiting the treasurys Lil Noun position. This foll ows prop 210, which redirected all future Lil Nouns emissions back to the Lil Noun treasury.
    0 references