Proposal 212 (Q1768): Difference between revisions

From Nouns Dev
(‎Changed an Item)
(‎Changed an Item)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Property / Team Name
I cannot find the name of the team or builder in the provided text
 
Property / Team Name: I cannot find the name of the team or builder in the provided text / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Summary
This proposal requests NounsDAO to burn Lil Noun held in its treasury by transferring it to the official Ethereum burn address. The goal is to exit the treasurys Lil Noun position and avoid conflicts of interest and favoritism. If the proposal passes, a follow-up proposal will be created to burn the remaining +720 Lil Nouns.
 
Property / Summary: This proposal requests NounsDAO to burn Lil Noun held in its treasury by transferring it to the official Ethereum burn address. The goal is to exit the treasurys Lil Noun position and avoid conflicts of interest and favoritism. If the proposal passes, a follow-up proposal will be created to burn the remaining +720 Lil Nouns. / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Related Channel
 
Property / Related Channel: The Jungle: Nouns DAO - 212-transfer-lilnoun1-to-burn-addr / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer
 
WTF is this prop?
Property / Question & Answer: WTF is this prop? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: WTF is this prop? / qualifier
 
Property / Question & Answer: WTF is this prop? / qualifier
 
Answer: The proposal in question is a serious attempt to grab Nouner's attention and act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency. It is most likely going to fail, but it may help obtain some answers. The proposal is related to concerns about a Nouner who didn't warn about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before voting on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167 and their removal as a Lil Nounder while still having a vote and collecting rewards on their multi-sig.
Property / Question & Answer
 
This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig?
Property / Question & Answer: This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Question & Answer: This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig? / qualifier
 
Property / Team Size
 
1
Amount1
Unit1
Property / Team Size: 1 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Abstain Count
 
0
Amount0
Unit1
Property / Abstain Count: 0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Team Name
 
The text does not provide information on the name of the team or builder that
Property / Team Name: The text does not provide information on the name of the team or builder that / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Summary
 
The proposal requests NounsDAO to transfer Lil Noun from its treasury to the official Ethereum burn address, as a first step towards exiting the treasurys Lil Noun position. This foll ows prop 210, which redirected all future Lil Nouns emissions back to the Lil Noun treasury.
Property / Summary: The proposal requests NounsDAO to transfer Lil Noun from its treasury to the official Ethereum burn address, as a first step towards exiting the treasurys Lil Noun position. This foll ows prop 210, which redirected all future Lil Nouns emissions back to the Lil Noun treasury. / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:01, 17 July 2023

A Nouns proposal.
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proposal 212
A Nouns proposal.

    Statements

    instance of
    Proposal
    0 references
    Label
    Transfer Lil Noun 1 held in the NounsDAO treasury to the official Ethereum burn address
    0 references
    Id
    212
    0 references
    ExecutionETA
    17 January 2023
    0 references
    Quorumvotes
    58
    0 references
    Status
    CANCELLED
    0 references
    Opposer Count
    0
    0 references
    Supporter Count
    0
    0 references
    Proposal Type
    Transfer
    0 references
    Lil noun #1
    0 references
    Nounsdao treasury
    0 references
    Official ethereum
    0 references
    Previous Proposal
    Proposal 76
    0 references
    Proposal 210
    0 references
    Proposal Submission Date
    17 January 2023
    0 references
    Question & Answer
    WTF is this prop?
    Related Channel
    The Jungle: Nouns DAO - 212-transfer-lilnoun1-to-burn-addr
    Answer
    The proposal in question is a serious attempt to grab Nouner's attention and act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency. It is most likely going to fail, but it may help obtain some answers. The proposal is related to concerns about a Nouner who didn't warn about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before voting on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167 and their removal as a Lil Nounder while still having a vote and collecting rewards on their multi-sig.
    0 references
    This is a serious prop to grab Nouner's attention. Let's not kid ourselves it is most likely going to fail, however maybe it can help us obtain some answers and can act as a protest vote against the lack of transparency.--For example, we are now on DAY 3 of 'Jacob-gate' <@400168997779275778> . You know the Nouner who didn't warn us about a potential 300 ETH tax liability before we voted on 'Nouns Builder' prop 167? Why was Jacob removed as a Lil Nounder this month, but still has a vote and is collecting rewards on their multi-sig?
    Related Channel
    The Jungle: Nouns DAO - 212-transfer-lilnoun1-to-burn-addr
    0 references
    Team Size
    1
    0 references
    Abstain Count
    0
    0 references
    Team Name
    The text does not provide information on the name of the team or builder that
    0 references
    Summary
    The proposal requests NounsDAO to transfer Lil Noun from its treasury to the official Ethereum burn address, as a first step towards exiting the treasurys Lil Noun position. This foll ows prop 210, which redirected all future Lil Nouns emissions back to the Lil Noun treasury.
    0 references
     
    Retrieved from "https://nounsdev.wikibase.cloud/w/index.php?title=Item:Q1768&oldid=9490"